Evidence at Trial
Get Involved
Evidence at Trial
A Distorted Narrative: The Evidence You Weren’t Meant to See
During the trial, key pieces of evidence that could have altered the outcome were either suppressed, overlooked, or misrepresented. This crucial evidence, including forensic DNA findings, painted a very different picture from the one presented in court.
Suppressed DNA Findings
Despite forensic experts conducting detailed DNA analyses, critical results supporting Elliott Summers’ innocence were withheld from the defence team. This omission led to a trial based on incomplete evidence, denying the jury a chance to assess the full truth.
Contradictory Testimonies
Several witness statements contained inconsistencies that were not adequately scrutinised. Cross-examinations revealed contradictions that could have cast serious doubt on the allegations. However, these inconsistencies received minimal attention during the proceedings.
Legal Oversight
Evidence management protocols were not followed to the highest standard. Disclosure requirements under legal guidelines were breached, resulting in a one-sided narrative being presented to the court.
The Fight for Transparency
The story of Elliott Summers is not just about one man’s wrongful conviction—it’s about a justice system that failed to reveal the truth when it mattered most. His case highlights the urgent need for transparency and accountability within the legal process.